Mercury: Towards the Integrated Endgame

Summary


The Mercury upgrade marks an important transition towards Neutron’s endgame by migrating from Interchain Security (ICS) to a fully sovereign network. This shift will enable NTRN staking and drive the productive use of NTRN across the ecosystem.

To ensure a smooth migration while maintaining continued alignment between the Cosmos Hub and Neutron, the proposal signals support for the repurposing and return of NTRN from the Cosmos Hub Community Pool.

What Does it Mean for Me as an NTRN Holder?

As an NTRN holder, this proposal offers the opportunity to participate in staking, either natively or through liquid staking, and to secure the network and receive rewards, which can be magnified by participating in DeFi.

It preserves Neutron’s fixed supply and deflationary properties while creating new opportunities to use NTRN and its derivatives throughout the ecosystem.

What Does it Mean for Me as a Validator?

If this proposal is accepted, Cosmos Hub validators will continue running Neutron nodes until the network migration is complete. This requires performing the Mercury upgrade and successfully validating a number of blocks thereafter. To ensure a smooth migration, an initial set of 20 validators has been selected to run the network post-Mercury.

Motivation


In 2023, Neutron became the first network secured by the Cosmos Hub’s Interchain Security (ICS).

Since then, both networks have evolved. Cosmos Hub has undergone fundamental changes in its leadership and vision, and Neutron has doubled down on revolutionizing finance by enabling an ecosystem of unique, powerful, and deeply integrated DeFi applications.

Mercury opens the next chapter in the relationship between the two networks, empowering them both to progress rapidly towards their goals:

  • It signals support for the launch of permissionless smart-contracts on the Hub, to bootstrap a native, ATOM-aligned ecosystem and offer best-in-class service to appchains to become the center for interchain services and drive more value to ATOM.
  • It empowers Neutron to improve network performance and infrastructure reliability, target new, exciting markets, drive value to the NTRN token, and enable new use cases within the network’s ecosystem.

Benefits to Neutron


Mercury marks a key milestone in Neutron’s history, heralding groundbreaking technical improvements and rapid ecosystem growth.

Faster & More Powerful

What makes Neutron unique is its integrated infrastructure. Providing leading performance on top of this differentiated value proposition optimizes the user experience and the design space for financial applications.

Thanks to improvement in the network’s consensus and block production process, Mercury paves the way to massive performance improvements. It empowers Neutron to reduce latency from ~1.8s today to ~100ms by the end of the year, for lightning-fast transactions and trades.

These improvements also support a 11x increase in gas per block, from 30M to 330M, making Neutron one of the highest throughput chains in the industry and unlocking compute intensive and advanced use cases like perpetual futures clusters.

Overall, Mercury considerably improves the performance and reliability of Neutron’s core primitives:

  • High Frequency Oracle: High reliability per-block price updates thanks to hardware and consensus stability improvements.
  • Duality Performance Boost & Risk Reduction: Improved performance and reduced risk for market-making protocols built on Duality (Neutron’s built-in orderbook) through auto-swap and behind-enemy-lines liquidity management.
  • Rapid Protocol Upgrades: Neutron’s sovereign validator set and distributed stake will enable faster network upgrades and incident response.
  • Bleeding-edge Tech Stack: Fewer dependencies such as the legacy CCV module unlock rapid iterations and network improvements.

Seamless user experience

  • Wallet abstraction: Log in to Neutron apps with Metamask, Phantom and other leading wallets or just an email address thanks to Neutron’s Ethereum Signature Verification and ecosystem-wide Privy integration.
  • Streamlined funding flows: Fund new accounts < 30s, starting with USDC over Skip Go Fast and expanding to BTC, ETH, SOL and other denoms this year.
  • Gas abstraction: No more getting stuck, pay gas in any token liquid on the network. Enjoy 30% discounts with $NTRN and $ATOM.

Ecosystem Growth

Mercury is meant to strengthen the NTRN token and rapidly grow the network’s market size:

  • 2x Network TVL: New markets and deep borrowing capacity for NTRN.
  • >$10M Liquidity: Trade in and out of positions with deep, out-of-the-box liquidity for NTRN and its derivatives.
  • 20+ New DeFi Opportunities for NTRN: From liquid staking to lending, borrowing, yield, bribes, spot and perps trading, and more.
  • New Ways to Earn: Earn NTRN staking rewards, Droplets, Ingots, and more by participating in DeFi.
  • Best Prices: Trade BTC, ETH, SOL, and other leading assets in size with minimal slippage, thanks to Duality and Supervaults.
  • Cosmos Hub Campaign: ~4.2M NTRN earmarked to drive the growth of ATOM and other Cosmos Hub-related assets and use-cases through Neutron DeFi.

Technical Implementation


Overview

Mercury includes an array of technical changes and executable messages:

  • Schedule a network ugprade on April 9th to perform the migration out of ICS
  • Implement Neutron’s staking model:
    • Set base validator compensation to $3,000 per month
    • Set performance thresholds as follows:
      • Block signing: 95% to 99.5%
      • Price updates: 95% to 98%
    • Set target staking rewards to 3% APR
    • Disable slashing
  • Register the DAO’s Staked NTRN Voting Vault
  • Bolster the network’s security and economy by strategically deploying the DAO’s treasury:
    • Stake 225,000,000 NTRN with Drop Protocol
    • Migrate NTRN - USDC liquidity to dNTRN - USDC
    • Provide 25,000,000 NTRN and the equivalent value of dNTRN as Passive Concentrated Liquidity on Astroport
    • Lend 5,000,000 NTRN on Mars Protocol

Executable messages and network binaries have been thoroughly reviewed, tested, audited, and rehearsed on the pion-1 testnet. Audit reports will be attached once publicly released ahead of the upgrade.

Network Migration

Mercury introduces the native staking module and a special upgrade handler to migrate the validator set. New validators are introduced with real voting power (VP) and follow all standard staking rules. The new validator set gets voting power via a delegation of NTRN tokens by Neutron Main DAO to Drop in the upgrade handler. Legacy ICS validators are added with a nominal stake (1 token) to ensure they are processed correctly before being removed from the active set.

IBC Channel Migration

Post-Mercury, Hermes automatically sends multiple UpdateClient messages. The headers include both the legacy (ICS) and new validator sets, ensuring that the IBC light client transitions correctly.

Staking Model


Mercury differs from traditional PoS in several ways:

  • Fixed Supply: NTRN will remain a fixed-supply asset. Block rewards will remain set to 0. All rewards will be paid by the Neutron DAO Treasury, and all revenue will accrue to the Neutron DAO Treasury.
  • Opinionated Approach: The network’s DAO participates in staking by setting and enforcing policies, as well as directly through staking via its treasury. The development and adoption of liquid staking is actively encouraged within the boundaries and checks and balances set by the DAO.
  • DAO Delegations: The Neutron DAO will delegate a large portion of its treasury to the set of curated validators to help ensure the security of the network and the stability of these operators in the set.
  • Narrow Validator Scope: The role of node operators is to provide performant, reliable infrastructure, but not to serve as governance representatives. Delegated stake will not confer governance voting power to validators. It is possible for validators to opt into participating in the ecosystem in additional capacities, but this is not required as it is on other dPoS networks.
  • Base Comp: Validators will automatically receive stable monthly compensation from the Neutron DAO Treasury based on their performance.
  • No Commissions: Commissions do not apply to delegator staking rewards, which will be paid out by the Neutron DAO Treasury through an independent system that targets a stable 3% APR.
  • No Slashing: In dPoS, slashing disproportionately impacts delegators rather than the misbehaving operators themselves. Slashing also disincentivizes validators from being reactive during network upgrades, as that is when the slashing risk is the highest. For these reasons, slashing will be disabled in favor of jailing and tombstoning.

Initial Validator Set

This proposal recommends the following 20 operators for the network’s initial validator set:

CryptoCrew, Quokka Stake, Allnodes, Chorus One, cosmosrescue, Cosmostation, Crosnest, Golden Ratio Staking, Hadron Labs, Informal Systems, iqlusion, Kiln, P2P, Polkachu, POSTHUMAN, Provalidator, SG-1, Smart Stake, Stake&Relax, Stakecito

To assemble the proposed validator set, we analyzed the historical performance and service quality of all Cosmos Hub validators running the Neutron network and eliminated known sybil nodes, as well as nodes affiliated with centralized exchanges and custodians. We weighted raw performance metrics (90D % oracle/block signed, etc) with qualitative metrics based on more than a year of experience coordinating planned and emergency upgrades.

Validator Compensation

Mercury’s validator compensation mechanism is designed to ensure that performing validators receive predictable rewards to cover their costs and margin, regardless of market prices, while ensuring the network does not overpay for security during bull phases.

It implements x/revenue , a new module responsible for rewarding validators for their operational performance. Using the network’s oracle, the module calculates the appropriate amount of NTRN tokens needed to cover the target compensation set by the DAO. These rewards are transferred from the Neutron DAO Treasury directly to the validators.

The initial target compensation is $3,000 / month.

Validator Performance Thresholds

The x/revenue module also tracks validator performance and adjusts the reward accordingly.

Each criterion represents a critical service provided by the validator set: % of blocks signed and % of x/oracle prices provided. Additional criteria may be added in the future as the network evolves. For each criterion, the module implements a lower and upper performance threshold.

Val. performance 30D Block Signed 30D Prices Provided Outcome
Above… 99.5% 98% Full rewards
Between… 99.5% - 95% 98% - 95% Partial rewards
Below… 95% 95% No rewards

Validators who fail to meet the minimum performance for any of the criteria receive no reward for the period, regardless of their performance in the other criterion.

Delegator Compensation

Users who delegate NTRN tokens to node operators via native or liquid staking receive staking rewards from the DAO treasury. The mechanism distributing these rewards is designed to target a low, fixed APR set by the DAO. The initial target APR parameter is 3%.

DeFi Landscape


A strong set of initial DeFi primitives have already assembled on the network, but to continue growing, it’s critical for its overall market size to increase.

To accomplish this, we propose that the Neutron DAO (currently holding ~370M NTRN) allocates 261M of its Neutron to proactively support liquidity and the creation of efficient markets while ensuring it doesn’t saturate attractive opportunities.

Position Allocation Protocol Rationale
Pre-load staking rewards contract 6,000,000 NTRN Neutron Fund staking rewards for the next 6-12 months
Pre-load x/revenue 700,000 NTRN Neutron Fund validator compensation prior to the receipt of Prop 993 NTRN
Stake NTRN with Drop as part of the migration 100,000,000 NTRN Drop Network security & Valset curation
Stake NTRN with Drop over time with Valence 125,000,000 NTRN Drop Network security & Valset curation
Bootstrap dNTRN - NTRN liquidity 25,000,000 NTRN + an equivalent value of dNTRN from the DAO’s stake Astroport Maintain deep liquidity between NTRN and USDC through multihop swaps
Migrate NTRN - USDC POL to dNTRN - USDC N/A Astroport Maximize dNTRN liquidity in order to unlock DeFi integrations & Minimize IL for the DAO through the PCL algorithm.
Total 256,000,000 NTRN

Protocol Self-Stake

Today, Drop is the only liquid staking protocol on the network and, therefore, the most logical choice for the DAO’s delegation.

In the future, should additional liquid staking protocols launch on Neutron, the DAO should consider splitting its delegations accordingly and adopting guidelines on how to define protocol eligibility and weights among the protocols.

In the meantime, by delegating ~22.5% of the NTRN token supply through Drop, the DAO may protect the network from economic attacks and facilitate ongoing delegation management thanks to Drop’s expertise and existing monitoring infrastructure.

In exchange for its delegation, the DAO will receive a corresponding amount of dNTRN, a portion of which will be earmarked for bootstrapping dNTRN - NTRN liquidity.

Deep Spot Liquidity for NTRN and dNTRN

Liquidity determines slippage for large participants when entering and exiting positions, as well as the listing parameters for an asset on credit protocols such as Mars.

Ensuring there is tremendous liquidity available for NTRN and dNTRN minimizes onboarding friction for large participants, which are critical to an active market, and ensures competitive listing parameters/capacity for all users to use NTRN as collateral.

Of the six possible venues for the DAO to bootstrap liquidity, Astroport Passive Concentrated Liquidity (PCL) is preferred because:

  • The DAO already relies on PCL for POL, and the protocol has been live since the mainnet launch.
  • PCL is designed to protect passive LPs through its dynamic fee model and rebalancing logic.
  • Deep PCL liquidity on Duality will generate significant volumes alongside Margined, Supervaults, and other liquidity managers.
Venue / Criteria Live? Passive? On Duality? Trustless?
Astroport PCL Yes Yes Yes Yes
Margined vault Yes Yes Yes No
Astrovault Yes Yes No
Duality Yes No
Supervaults No
Electron No
  1. Migrate NTRN - USDC Liquidity to dNTRN - USDC

Token-to-stablecoin is the most capital-intensive form of liquidity to secure.

Instead of focusing on native-asset-to-stablecoin, the DAO and Drop have demonstrated with dATOM that concentrating on derivative-to-stablecoin liquidity effectively lowers the cost of liquidity, improves peg stability, and maintains volumes (e.g., Astroport volumes migrated from ATOM pools to dATOM pools after the DAO’s liquidity migration).

Therefore, the DAO should migrate its NTRN - USDC liquidity to dNTRN - USDC, lowering the cost of liquidity and enabling deep dNTRN DeFi integrations.

  1. Bootstrap dNTRN - NTRN Liquidity

To ensure that NTRN retains a deep path to stablecoin liquidity, bootstrapping deep NTRN - dNTRN liquidity is also critical. Fortunately, the DAO is well-positioned to ensure that this is achieved as early as the migration.

We propose to pair 25,000,000 NTRN tokens from the treasury with the equivalent amount of dNTRN from the initial staking operation to the provisioning of dNTRN - NTRN liquidity to preserve all existing listing parameters and integrations.

Deep Lending Supply

To stimulate network activity, the DAO should provide additional lending capacity, keeping borrowing rates low and encouraging users to borrow and use NTRN throughout the ecosystem.

Today, Mars is the primary credit protocol on the network. We propose to start by gradually allocating 5,000,000 NTRN to the Red Bank, which has been deployed on the network for an extended period of time.

Edit: the execution of this allocation will be handled in a separate proposal to minimize code complexity during the migration.

The Use of NTRN in DeFi

The above measures will create favorable conditions for the use of NTRN and its derivatives in DeFi by ensuring ample liquidity for users to enter/exit positions, as well as for protocols to manage risks. In turn, this is expected to increase borrowing activity, perpetual futures trading, basis trading, and more.

Governance Model

The introduction of NTRN staking has an impact on Neutron’s governance model, which currently relies on liquid NTRN deposits to dedicated voting vaults. To ensure a smooth transition, this proposal implemented Staked NTRN vaults, which ensure native stakers have access to governance voting power.

For the sake of brevity, future governance developments and improvements, such as optimistic governance, delegations, proof-based governance, and technical subDAOs, will be discussed separately.

Staked NTRN Voting Vault

To ensure that native stake delegations are recognized as voting power on the network, a dedicated vault will be deployed as part of the network’s migration. For each address, the vault will grant 1 point of governance power per NTRN delegated to a validator via the staking module.

Relationship with the Hub


To date, a key challenge for the Interchain has been the relative lack of success stories to drive activity and capital into the ecosystem. For the Interchain to grow, we believe the success of Neutron and the Hub is critical.

Productively Utilizing Community Pool Tokens

The Cosmos Hub Community Pool received 42,727,950 unclaimed NTRN from Neutron’s airdrop to the Cosmos Hub. As part of the ICS off-boarding process, NTRN allocations will be proposed to Cosmos Hub governance to enable the smooth migration while sponsoring the continued alignment of the network and their communities.

See the related proposal on the Cosmos Hub forum: [PROPOSAL 993][DRAFT] Neutron and the Hub: A new chapter - Hub Proposals - Cosmos Hub Forum

The proposed allocations are presented below:

Item Amount % Recipient
Honor existing commitments 2,160,000 5.06% Already distributed to relevant multisigs, does not need to be transferred
Fund offboarding validation 1,000,000 2.34% Joint Committee
Ongoing security budget 10,800,000 25.28% Joint Committee
ATOM-related incentives/campaigns 4,272,795 10.00% Joint Committee
Allocated for future partnerships 4,272,795 10.00% Joint Committee
Return to the Neutron DAO 20,222,360 47.33% Joint Committee
Total 42,727,950 100.00% NA
Left in CP > 5,672.19 NA From CP tax on staking rewards

Honor Existing Commitments (Connect Beta + Validator Incentives)

Validator Incentives that have already been allocated to vesting contracts are slated to fully vest on March 26th, 2025.

Connect incentives remain to be distributed. We are finalizing work with Numia to provide the data required to check the validator’s performance and distribute the rewards. Once that is done, we will coordinate with the prop 931 committee signers to execute the transfer.

Fund Validator Operations Leading Up to Migration

Since the migration’s success relies on smooth validator operations, we propose to allocate an additional 1M NTRN to be distributed to validators pro-rata their voting power based on the following criteria:

  • ≥ 50% participation on the last 10 Cosmos Hub proposals
  • ≥ 95% block uptime on Neutron over the past 3 months, looking back from migration time
  • ≥ 95% Slinky uptime on Neutron over the past 3 months, looking back from migration time
  • Properly carry out the migration upgrade

Fund Neutron’s Security Budget Following Migration

To migrate from ICS, Neutron will need to bootstrap a sovereign validator set and fund its operations. This validator set will be inherited from the best/most aligned Cosmos Hub validators.

Tokens will be allocated to the Base Comp mechanism to cover validator costs for the first 24 months of the network’s operations as an independent blockchain.

Fund ATOM-related Campaigns on Neutron

To sponsor the continued alignment of the projects and their communities, ~4M NTRN will be reserved for incentives/campaigns tailored to the Cosmos Hub’s assets and community.

  • Liquidity incentives to ATOM, dATOM, and other Cosmos Hub assets
  • Incentives to cover the opportunity cost of converting from native staking to liquid staking
  • ATOM spot and perps trading campaigns
  • Other ATOM-aligned campaigns

Allocation for Future Joint Ventures

Tokens earmarked to support future joint ventures benefiting both ecosystems, such as supporting the growth and adoption of CosmWasm, joint hacker houses and hackathons, etc.

Return Excess to the Neutron DAO

The remainder will be returned to the Neutron DAO Treasury.

Supporting Permissionless smart-contracts on the Hub

The launch of permissionless smart-contracts on the Hub will contribute to the growth of the Cosmos market and create new opportunities to attract ambitious developers and entrepreneurs. The success of the Hub and ATOM will attract attention, users, and liquidity to the ecosystem.

This proposal signals the Neutron DAO’s continued support for the success of the Cosmos Hub and the launch of permissionless smart-contracts on the Hub.

Future Collaborations

Mercury marks the start of a new chapter in the relationship between Neutron and the Cosmos Hub.

Looking ahead:

  • Neutron will continue to be a prime venue for ATOM holders looking to participate in DeFi.
  • The Neutron Foundation and DAO will continue to work closely with Cosmos Hub-related entities to sponsor the development and adoption of CosmWasm.
  • The Hub’s routing, bridging, and intents offering under IBC Eureka will be integrated with Neutron, which will drive volume and activity to both networks.

Governance votes

The following items summarize the voting options and what it means for this proposal:

YES - You support the launch of permissionless smart-contracts on the Hub, Neutron’s migration to a sovereign network and the proposed allocation of Community Pool NTRN.

NO - You disagree with the launch of permissionless smart-contracts on the Hub, Neutron’s migration to a sovereign network and the proposed allocation of Community Pool NTRN.

ABSTAIN - You wish to contribute to the quorum but you formally decline to vote either for or against the proposal.

4 Likes

It does make sense to me why Neutron wants to go Sovereign. However, I don’t see why that would require a clawback of the NTRN allocated to the Cosmos Hub Treasury? Why not let the Hub Treasury stake their NTRN as dNTRN and help secure Neutron, or specify that Hub Treasury only use their NTRN allocation for purposes that aligns with the growth for both parties.

The funds were given under a number of expectations and promises that did not come to fruition. The best path forward is to honor the incurred validator costs, allocate some to ATOM incentives and minimize drama moving forward. This is proposal accomplishes this.

Couldn’t be more excited about the future of Neutron, let’s make Neutron the #1 chain.

This is the stepping stone in the right direction, to be the best Defi chain out there.

3 Likes

Awesome to see you here 0XCarn.

The way I see it is there was a service agreement (however loose) which has been broken a number of times (e.g., poor validator uptime, especially during upgrades; deprecation of replicated security; a likely impending launch of permissionless CW).

In my opinion, as so many things have changed (to Neutron’s detriment) so too should the payments tied to those agreements.

I think it make sense to honor previous as future CH validator costs, and to reward some in the form of incentives to ATOM holders and users. Past that I think it’s more than fair to create a clean slate on both sides.

In my opinion, if the ICL really wants to enact change in the ecosystem, one thing to nail is setting a good precedent for future partners. Pressing the restart button (in addition to incentive allocations and validator payments) seems like a really good outcome viewed in this light.

It seems like a step in the right direction, but I have a question: How many validators do you ultimately plan to onboard? Will there be only 20, or is there a plan to expand the active set in the future? Having just 20 validators doesn’t seem like the best practice for decentralization.

Hey ser, welcome to the Neutron forum and appreciate the question.

TLDR: We’re unlikely to increase the number of validators, but we’ll open up the application process once the migration is complete.

Why do we care about the decentralization of the validator set? Because it provides valuable properties to the network’s users: it increases resilience against failures and attacks, it reduces the potential for collusion, etc. These properties (security and resilience) are what we care about in this context.

Now, is increasing the number of validators the best way to achieve these objectives? Practice seems to indicate that this is not the case:

  • Looking at the majority of Cosmos chains, increases in active validator counts have generally not massively contributed to the decentralization of the chains, because the new validators struggle to get enough VP to reliably participate in consensus. The incumbent validators (often large centralized entities with vertically integrated stake acquisition channels) tend to capture most of the stake and become themselves single points of failure (see Coinbase on Cosmos Hub with >10% of the VP while there are 200 validator slots).
  • Likewise on Ethereum, where there are significant efforts to encourage home staking and validator diversity, the vast majority of VP is concentrated in these channels (Coinbase represents 8% of all validators for instance).

Based on this, we can infer the following: what matters is not so much the number of validators, but how stake is distributed among them, and how diverse their infrastructure, geographies etc are.

This is the core of our approach to Neutron validation: we are resolving the trade-offs between performance, cost and security for the network through a small curated set with flat stake distribution thanks to opinionated DAO delegations.

This allows us to eliminate single points of failure while optimizing cost and performance.

2 Likes

The article claims that the 20 initial validators were selected based on the historical performance and service quality of all Cosmos Hub validators , but this is clearly not the case .

For example:

POSTHUMAN

03/06/2025 14:56:55 – Jailed (Slashed on consumer chain )

02/26/2025 20:21:33 – Jailed (Slashed on consumer chain )

12/14/2024 14:28:57 – Jailed (Slashed on consumer chain )

11/18/2024 23:24:22 – Jailed

06/24/2024 13:30:16 – Jailed

03/28/2024 23:21:48 – Jailed

03/13/2024 18:52:11 – Jailed

SG-1

11/07/2024 14:27:24 – Jailed

07/23/2024 18:00:13 – Jailed

04/25/2024 10:26:50 – Jailed

iqlusion

08,030,710 (2021-10-16) – Jailed

07,562,942 (2021-09-06) – Jailed

Allnodes

03/04/2021 04:01:09 – Jailed

Additionally, Hadron Labs is not even a Cosmos Hub validator .

It is very clear that several of these validators have been jailed multiple times , and some were even jailed for failing to properly operate consumer chains .

Thus, this list of 20 validators was obviously not selected based on performance . Since this involves the use of community pool funds , Neutron should conduct a fair selection process based on actual performance and service transparency .

Otherwise, this proposal should be rejected .

Hey ser, appreciate the input.

We’ll review the validator set composition post-Mercury and launch an open process to apply for delegations.